Is it not enough trying to make a decision between politicians by sifting through what they say is true and what's not (see Fact Checkers?! Really!?) without then bamboozling the electorate with random methods of voting?
Plan A: Names on paper, mark the ones you wanna vote for. Easy.
OR
Plan B: Have numerous different systems of voting, some of which require a manual. Huh?
I understand the reasoning, the USA is a big country, so modernization or computerization makes the counting process faster and, theoretically at least, more accurate. And I get that the Constitution gives States the right to use their own system. Then there's the whole voting for a hundred different things at the same time thing.
But come on. Surely a pen and paper(s), a large number of booths and boxes with holes in, and people that are both numerate and literate to count the blasted things would prevent a whole lot of confusion.
Anyway, as the saying goes; "Vote early, vote often"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment